dfp_header_hidden_string

Get our free email newsletter with just one click

What If Women Ruled the World? review at Mayfield, Manchester – ‘muddled and fragmented’

A scene from What If Women Ruled the World? at Mayfield, Manchester. Photo: Tristram Kenton

Apocalypse is a running theme at this year’s Manchester International Festival. While Party Skills for the End of the World stages a post-apocalyptic blowout, What if Women Ruled the World? uses catastrophe as an opportunity to do things differently.

Opening with a chaotic, compressed version of Dr Strangelove, Yael Bartana’s film and performance project turns the movie’s conclusion on its head. What if women, rather than men, were in charge of re-establishing the human race in the aftermath of disaster?

The premise is compelling, but its execution is messy and disjointed. It’s somehow both too structured and not structured enough: the discussion of the invited female experts is forced into a restrictive form, while the various individual parts of the show – including odd little monologues and video interludes – hang awkwardly together. The scenario, meanwhile, is muddled, swinging back and forth between real-life global challenges and the fictional Armageddon occupied by the performers.

The experts themselves put forward sensible and rigorously researched solutions to the world’s problems. Suggestions range from a crackdown on tax havens to more sustainable use of natural resources. In the hands of these women – who on the opening night include feminist writer Natasha Walter and virologist Dr Marion Koopmans – the world looks pretty safe.

But then why not just put these five women on a panel? Despite the best efforts of the cast, it’s often unclear what the performative flourishes are adding. It feels like a waste of both an intriguing idea and a line-up of fascinating women.

We need your help…

When you subscribe to The Stage, you’re investing in our journalism. And our journalism is invested in supporting theatre and the performing arts.

The Stage is a family business, operated by the same family since we were founded in 1880. We do not receive government funding. We are not owned by a large corporation. Our editorial is not dictated by ticket sales.

We are fully independent, but this means we rely on revenue from readers to survive.

Help us continue to report on great work across the UK, champion new talent and keep up our investigative journalism that holds the powerful to account. Your subscription helps ensure our journalism can continue.

Subscribers to The Stage get 10% off The Stage Tickets’ price
Verdict
Urgent political discussion let down by a muddled and fragmented structure
^