Losers review at Rosemary Branch Theatre, London – ’emotionally engaging’
Pitched somewhere between a high-stakes drinking game and an unethical 1950s psychology experiment, Losers explores the contemporary obsession with celebrity. Equipped with handsets for electronic voting, and assured that “no question could be too inappropriate”, the audience is asked to judge four contestants auditioning for reality TV.
The young, committed cast – who devised and designed the production as a dissertation project – play caricatures of themselves, likeable, flawed, and desperate for fame. In a few minutes of pre-show preamble, they each establish a distinct persona, trying out various tactics for winning us over. Arthur Jones, for example, flirts and flatters, while a hyperactive Rachel Johnson hands out signed headshots.
As the performance goes on, and the forfeits for failure become increasingly sadistic, these strategies give way to backstabbing, catty cruelty, and shameless spectacle.
Silly set-pieces – such as a flawlessly executed dance routine to Beyonce’s Single Ladies – slowly segue into outright humiliation, flagellation, and a particularly unpleasant use of a stapler. Buzzers blare and countdowns tick away on omnipresent screens as the performers preen and demean themselves for our approval, literally scrabbling for the spotlight.
All this exhibitionism could easily become grotesque, but Tit4Twat has taken care to make the show emotionally engaging, too. Repeatedly put on the spot, the performers display genuine vulnerability, as well as impressive improvisational skills.
Beneath the scornful satire, this is a surprisingly thoughtful study of the dynamics that drive some to seek fame at any cost, and compel others to watch them try.
We need your help…
When you subscribe to The Stage, you’re investing in our journalism. And our journalism is invested in supporting theatre and the performing arts.
The Stage is a family business, operated by the same family since we were founded in 1880. We do not receive government funding. We are not owned by a large corporation. Our editorial is not dictated by ticket sales.
We are fully independent, but this means we rely on revenue from readers to survive.
Help us continue to report on great work across the UK, champion new talent and keep up our investigative journalism that holds the powerful to account. Your subscription helps ensure our journalism can continue.