Get our free email newsletter with just one click

Three quarters of parents would prefer their kids to study maths over the arts, research suggests

Photo: Shutterstock
by -

Three quarters of parents value academic subjects including maths and English over creative ones such as music, art and design, a new survey has suggested.

One thousand parents with children under 18 were polled about their attitudes towards subjects at school and university by Escape Studios, a London-based higher education provider for visual effects and animation.

Andrew Lloyd Webber criticises ‘short-sighted’ arts education cuts

Parents chose maths (67%), English (62%) and computing (54%) as the most important subjects to study at school, whereas less than 20% opted for crafts, music or arts and design.

When asked which degrees would be most valuable from a lifelong career perspective, the top three choices were computing (13%), medicine (12%) and engineering (11%). The arts ranked last at 2%.

Almost half of parents said they would try to influence the degree their teenager chose to study at university, the research revealed.

Ian Palmer, director of Escape Studios, said: “The creative industries continue to grow at a substantial rate. Despite this, not enough parents are aware of the opportunities available to their children within this sector.”

The survey follows widespread criticism of cutbacks to creative subjects in secondary school education from figures including Andrew Lloyd Webber, Benedict Cumberbatch and Lenny Henry.

It is claimed that the government’s flagship education policy, the English Baccalaureate, is contributing to the erosion of arts subjects at GCSE level, with core subjects such as maths, English and science being given preference.

Prince Charles: ‘Every child should have access to the arts at school’

We need your help…

When you subscribe to The Stage, you’re investing in our journalism. And our journalism is invested in supporting theatre and the performing arts.

The Stage is a family business, operated by the same family since we were founded in 1880. We do not receive government funding. We are not owned by a large corporation. Our editorial is not dictated by ticket sales.

We are fully independent, but this means we rely on revenue from readers to survive.

Help us continue to report on great work across the UK, champion new talent and keep up our investigative journalism that holds the powerful to account. Your subscription helps ensure our journalism can continue.