dfp_header_hidden_string

Get our free email newsletter with just one click

Castings based on number of Instagram followers a ‘disheartening’ trend, actors warn

Actors say the trend for castings performers based on their social media following means talent can be overlooked. Photo: Shutterstock
by -

Actors including West End star Hayley Tamaddon have criticised the rise of castings based on performers’ social media followings, claiming the move is depriving genuine talent of work.

The Casting Directors’ Guild has also called the “growing trend” within the entertainment industry of interest in an actor’s online following “disheartening”.

The issue was brought to light after actor Stephen Hoyle shared a job advert for a commercial on Twitter that said applicants had to have “more than 5,000 followers on Instagram”.

It drew criticism from performers, who said casting based on an online following meant talent risked being overlooked.

It prompted actors to share their stories of such castings, ranging from West End shows, to commercials and films.

Tamaddon, a former Emmerdale and Coronation Street star now appearing in Everybody’s Talking About Jamie, said she had been seen for a West End show a few years ago, where she had been asked about her online following.

“I thought I did a good read, I was right for the role, and they seemed really happy with what I’d done. Then, at the end of the process one of them, the producer I think, asked me how many Twitter followers I had,” she said.

She added: “I was quite shocked. I stumbled and said: ‘Over 100,000, I think’, and asked why [they asked]. And they said they needed the lead role to have a good social media following as it would help sell tickets.”

Tamaddon said she confronted them, and said she hoped they might judge it on her acting.

“But the girl that went in after me had 20,000 more followers on Twitter and she got the role. I mean, you can actually just do your homework privately, can’t you? Look it up for yourself, but don’t ask me that after I’ve just given you my best bit of acting,” she added.

Hayley Tamaddon: WTF? It’s never acceptable for audiences to verbally abuse the performers

Actor Joseph Batchelor said he had recently attended a casting for a fast-food restaurant commercial and added: “Even though the role was just as a walk-on supporting artist, I was still asked for my social media handles, which I thought was ridiculous.”

Similarly, Bethany Fenton said she had auditioned for a non-speaking featured role in a furniture advert, and had been asked for her Instagram handle and number of followers.

“It should be about talent, but I suppose followers are often a sign of social currency and popularity, which businesses like Netflix or furniture companies want,” she said.

Meanwhile, Alexa Morden said she had been put forward for an independent British feature film but had lost out to another actor who had “marketing value” because of her Twitter followers.

“I understand where the ‘marketing’ argument comes from, I’ve missed out on roles before that have gone to previous child stars or those with a ‘profile’ in order to get investors and bums on seats. But it’s now making getting roles feel impossible,” she said.

The CDG acknowledged the trend, and said it stemmed from the idea that “a large social following will equal a bigger audience draw”.

But a spokeswoman added: “It is disheartening for casting directors to have excellent actors overlooked in favour of social media popularity, and the CDG works hard to promote actors on the skills they bring to a project.”

Mark Shenton: Social media can be theatre’s best friend – or its worst enemy

We need your help…

When you subscribe to The Stage, you’re investing in our journalism. And our journalism is invested in supporting theatre and the performing arts.

The Stage is a family business, operated by the same family since we were founded in 1880. We do not receive government funding. We are not owned by a large corporation. Our editorial is not dictated by ticket sales.

We are fully independent, but this means we rely on revenue from readers to survive.

Help us continue to report on great work across the UK, champion new talent and keep up our investigative journalism that holds the powerful to account. Your subscription helps ensure our journalism can continue.

loading...
^