Shakespeare’s Globe sparks new row with lighting designers over claims of racial discrimination
The Association of Lighting Designers has hit back at an academic from Shakespeare’s Globe who claimed traditional theatre lighting discriminates against ethnic minority actors, labelling her comments as “shocking” and “almost uneducated”.
Farah Karim-Cooper, who is head of higher education and research at the Globe, made the comments in an article in the Telegraph.
Karim-Cooper said: “Using the same lighting and stage design as you do for white actors puts actors of colour at a disadvantage. There is a danger with traditionally dark, tragic, stage settings, that actors of colour merge into the background.”
The Globe does not use modern stage lighting or sound in its productions. A row over its use of contemporary lighting led to the departure of former artistic director Emma Rice, when the theatre’s board decided that the venue should return to more traditional practices.
The ALD, the professional body representing lighting designers, has issued a statement in response to Karim-Cooper’s comments, arguing that designers have “successfully been lighting Shakespeare’s plays for decades”.
“The question needs to be asked of Dr Farah Karim-Cooper and indeed the Globe – what do they think lighting designers do, because this piece [in the Telegraph] reflects only a very limited, almost uneducated, view of the craft of lighting design?” the statement said.
The ALD’s chair, Johanna Town, argued that choosing the right light and colour for the lighting design depends on many more features than just skin tone, including hair colour, eyes, eyebrows and facial hair.
“I find this shocking coming from the Globe – a theatre that has made the choice to remove lighting from its productions. The Globe stage is illuminated simply to recreate the flat light of daylight.”
We need your help…
When you subscribe to The Stage, you’re investing in our journalism. And our journalism is invested in supporting theatre and the performing arts.
The Stage is a family business, operated by the same family since we were founded in 1880. We do not receive government funding. We are not owned by a large corporation. Our editorial is not dictated by ticket sales.
We are fully independent, but this means we rely on revenue from readers to survive.
Help us continue to report on great work across the UK, champion new talent and keep up our investigative journalism that holds the powerful to account. Your subscription helps ensure our journalism can continue.