Brexit immigration proposals will ‘strangle’ theatrical tours and talent
Theresa May’s latest Brexit plans will “strangle the supply of vital talent” coming into the UK and cause a “bureaucratic nightmare” for touring shows, according to a range of senior figures in the performing arts.
According to the immigration proposals, announced earlier this month, there will be no preferential treatment for European Union workers, who will have to apply for specific category visas to come and work in the UK, as is the case for workers from the rest of the world.
The visas will be restricted to applicants who have a confirmed job offer and earn a minimum of £30,000 a year pro-rata, with the potential for it to rise to £50,000, a situation that leading figures have warned is not fit for purpose.
Society of London Theatre chief executive Julian Bird said he was concerned the latest Brexit migration plans would lead to a shortage of skilled workers and “severely impact the ability of the UK theatre industry to produce the world-class work for which it is renowned”.
He added: “The proposed salary thresholds are not a good indicator of skill or value and don’t recognise that many migrant workers in theatre and performing arts are often highly skilled freelancers.
“Associated costs such as visa fees and a slower recruitment process would have a financial impact and increase the administrative burden on employers.”
Deputy head of policy at the Creative Industries Federation Samuel Young echoed Bird’s comments, arguing that the proposed immigration system would “strangle the supply of vital talent” coming into the UK.
Equity general secretary Christine Payne agreed, adding: “We call for the skilled occupation list to be reviewed to add other specialisms to better reflect the diverse landscape of the performing arts industries.”
Culture secretary Jeremy Wright also said that allowing people into the UK on the basis of salary alone was “too blunt an instrument”, and that he would be raising the issue with the Home Office.
Equity and the Creative Industries Federation are among organisations calling for a creative visa that will last a year and offer access to creative workers across the EU.
BECTU Brexit specialist Tony Lennon argued that the biggest effect of the proposals would be on workers deemed as “low skilled”, including front-of-house and backstage employees, who often use their income to support their own creative projects in the UK.
Dance and opera rely heavily on international artists coming into the UK, but the immigration proposals will also affect the ability of British artists and productions to travel across the EU.
Lennon said that the additional paperwork required, as well as charges for transporting stage equipment into Europe and vehicle licenses, touring would become a “bureaucratic nightmare”, estimating that the costs of taking a show abroad would increase by 10%.
Michelle Williams, casting director at English National Opera, said: “We have covers or understudies for all our productions because we sing everything in English and we need the cover to know the translation.
“However, in many of the European houses they don’t have covers and if you cannot jump on a plane to Europe without doing paperwork in advance then they are less likely to be able to get British singers in at the last minute to do this.”
Touring theatre producer David Hutchinson from Selladoor, which has produced tours in countries including Belgium and Germany, also expressed concerns, slamming the proposals as “half-baked”.
He described the proposed visa process as “completely inappropriate as a mechanism for allowing artists and productions to cross borders” and warned it would create “endless challenges and anxiety for both artists and producers in exchanging work”.
He added: “The lack of detail and reassurances from the government around this issue and some of the frankly amateur politics and headline-grabbing hyperbole surrounding Brexit negotiations of late is threatening to damage not only the livelihood of companies and artists in the UK, but also the reputation of the UK as a country that values cultural exchange.”
The concerns over the Brexit proposals follow an open letter published in the Observer on October 6, warning that Brexit could “bring the British music industry to its knees”.
The Musicians’ Union and Incorporated Society of Musicians have also expressed concerns for musicians working in theatre, with ISM calling on freedom of movement to be protected for musicians and the MU warning that the current proposals could be “extremely detrimental” to the touring of work.
What are the proposals?
- An end to freedom of movement for EU citizens
- EU citizens will now have to apply through the same visa system used by applicants from the rest of the world to work in the UK
- The UK’s Tier 2 visa system allows 20,700 “high-skilled workers” into the UK each year, for any length of time up to three years
- To qualify, citizens must have a confirmed job offer or earn more than £30,000 pro rata
- Employers will have to pay an ‘immigrations skills charge’ when they bring in workers on the Tier 2 visa, which ranges from around £350 to £1,000 for larger organisations
- Applicants deemed to have “exceptional talent” can apply for a special visa. However, only 2,000 of these are available per year and these would be limited to, for example, performers who could prove they had won awards
The Creative Industries Federation is calling on the government to:
- Introduce a creative freelancers visa to enable freelancers to move more easily around the EU
- Allow businesses to bring in creative workers who do not meet the salary threshold of £30,000
- Scrap the immigration skills charge
- Ensure visa-free travel and same-day access for workers moving temporarily between the EU and UK
We need your help…
When you subscribe to The Stage, you’re investing in our journalism. And our journalism is invested in supporting theatre and the performing arts.
The Stage is a family business, operated by the same family since we were founded in 1880. We do not receive government funding. We are not owned by a large corporation. Our editorial is not dictated by ticket sales.
We are fully independent, but this means we rely on revenue from readers to survive.
Help us continue to report on great work across the UK, champion new talent and keep up our investigative journalism that holds the powerful to account. Your subscription helps ensure our journalism can continue.