dfp_header_hidden_string

Get our free email newsletter with just one click

A future made of virtual reality?

Audiences experience Migrations’ In the Eyes of the Animal at the Abandon Normal Devices Festival 2015 in Cumbria. Photo: Luca Marziale
by -

Virtual reality is nothing new. The term was, in fact, coined in 1938 by legendary theatre director Antonin Artaud. He used it to describe the illusory nature of characters and objects in the theatre – simultaneously real and imagined.

Technology has become more sophisticated since the clunky headsets and even clunkier graphics of early experiments. It’s only in the last couple of months that virtual reality headsets have hit the market, but VR is already being used in filmmaking, gaming, even open-heart surgery. Now it’s starting to invade theatre too.

In a shrewd attempt both to pre-empt and shape this new format, the National Theatre is experimenting with VR as a way of connecting with new audiences. A rehearsal room in the National Theatre Studio is full of tech: there’s a huge TV screen, cables everywhere, trestle tables covered in headsets and laptops.

Oscar Raby, a Chilean visual artist based in Australia, has been invited for a two-week residency to experiment with VR and theatre. The NT’s head of digital development, Toby Coffey, is keen to stress that there’s no endpoint in mind here: “People say, ‘Are you going to sit 1,000 people down in the Lyttelton with headsets for two hours?’ That’s not what we’re doing.”

Instead, it’s all about experimentation and play.

The NT is blazing a trail: by bringing experts in VR creation and experts in theatremaking into the same space, by initiating that dialogue, it is hoping to tap into the potential that VR offers for theatre. “We’ve got to get into this now,” Coffey says. “We don’t know where it’s going – no one knows where it’s going – but it’s so strong in terms of immersive storytelling we need to be developing it to find its right form for theatre.”

In these early days, VR sits on the fringes of other media but hasn’t yet quite found its own voice. According to Raby, “filmmaking is that strong colonising power that takes over and says, ‘This is expanded cinema’, yet again. How about making a big strong dialogue and a big strong case for theatre?”

VR has been a big presence at film and gaming festivals this year, but Coffey was surprised by the warm response to the NT’s presence at the Sundance Film Festival. “Everyone’s talking about the relevance of theatre. But when you look at VR work and someone says, ‘What’s the bit that’s theatre?’, it’s actually really difficult because it’s a combination of influences on all those different areas.”

The relationship with theatre is complex: VR doesn’t have the liveness that is such an essential part of the theatrical experience. But dramaturgically it requires many of the same skills as theatremaking. Raby explains that typically five people are involved in creating a VR project: director, producer, scriptwriter, 3D artist and a developer.

“The idea of devised work is really interesting,” Coffey says. “Everybody is learning from each other.” It’s collaboration born of necessity: theatremakers may have the narrative and dramaturgical skills, but they lack the technical knowledge; programmers and 3D modellers know how to build a virtual environment, but not necessarily what to put in it.

David Kaskel, artistic director of VR theatre company Breaking Fourth, is about to launch a virtual reality piece called CTRL about online gaming. He says it’s been “an iterative process between the writer, the director and the modellers”. Kaskel conceived the story, and then brought in playwright Abraham Parker, a recent graduate of the Royal Court Young Writers’ Programme. These projects are flourishing in part because they have adopted the bedrock of theatrical practice: collaboration.

According to Kaskel, “VR uses the techniques that are best encapsulated in theatre: what does it mean to grab the audience’s attention without being able to control what their eyes see?”

Whereas the job of a film director is to choose exactly what the audience sees in a small rectangular space, theatre directors cannot control the head movements of the audience. VR involves similar directorial techniques: how can you offer a 360-degree environment to an audience and guide the focus of their attention to where you want it to be?

“In the broadest sense, it is a theatrical medium,” says Kaskel. When he talks to theatremakers “it just clicks more naturally than some of the film people – who have to unlearn a lot. It’s not about close-up, it’s not about cuts, it’s not about pans”.

Breaking Fourth’s CTRL uses “techniques that are best encapsulated in theatre”. Photo: Breaking Fourth
Breaking Fourth’s CTRL uses “techniques that are best encapsulated in theatre”. Photo: Breaking Fourth

Coffey and Raby agree. For good theatremakers, the ability to direct the audience’s attention in a three-dimensional environment is instinctive.

What’s unique about CTRL is that, when it opens in London, 20 people will experience it at the same time. One of the fundamental aspects of theatre is that it’s experienced as part of an audience, with other people. VR is, mostly, a solo pursuit. Even if you wanted 200 people to experience a VR piece at the same time, and had the budget for it, Coffey says that availability is an issue.

“We were looking at an event recently where we wanted 200 headsets. Everyone said we weren’t going to get 200 headsets from one person; we were going to have to go to three different suppliers.”

And, although Kaskel explored making CTRL a multiplayer experience, bringing another person into a shared digital environment is logistically and technologically complicated – not to mention a lot more expensive. “The technology just isn’t there yet,” says Kaskel. “But it will be in a couple of years.”

So, is VR a diminishment of the community aspect of theatre? Far from it, according to Karine Decorne, whose company Migrations is behind a new VR experience in Cardiff. In the Eyes of the Animal allows the user to explore the world from the perspective of a frog, owl or dragonfly. “It’s about bridging gaps. It offers a new way to connect and make people look differently at an art form that they may think is really traditional.”

While CTRL markets itself as theatre, In the Eyes of the Animal is more reticent about its genre. Decorne thinks of it as a hybrid: “My first response is to think of it as visual art, but it’s so much more. There are documentary aspects to it, it’s rooted in science, and it’s artistic in its own right.”

Home: Aamir, created in association with Surround Vision and Room One, is a project from the National Theatre’s Immersive Storytelling Studio. Photo: National Theatre
Home: Aamir, created in association with Surround Vision and Room One, is a project from the National Theatre’s Immersive Storytelling Studio. Photo: National Theatre

On Broadway, among some of the mega-producers such as Disney, toes have been dipped into VR but in less experimental ways. Last year, Disney produced a VR video of The Circle of Life from The Lion King, while Andrew Lloyd Webber’s musical School of Rock filmed one of its songs in 360 degrees. The videos (which are available on YouTube and can be viewed with budget headset Google Cardboard) are fun, but are more promotional tools than pieces of VR theatre.

Coffey dismisses the idea that this might be the future for NT Live. For him, and for the National, it’s about doing something new. “When you bring the tech in and people have a go with it, they just realise what the opportunity for change is.” So far, the NT has created one generated VR piece – for the musical Wonder.land – and one film piece, a verbatim documentary set in the Calais Jungle, in which you hear the story of Sudanese migrant Aamir while exploring the tents and trailers of this makeshift city.

So, amid all this excitement, what are the drawbacks? Well, all the pieces on offer at the moment are short – about 12 minutes each. And, of course, there’s a significant cost implication of using technology that’s so new. Kaskel estimates that CTRL cost around £50,000 – “what it would cost to make an Off-West End production.”

According to Decorne, it all depends on the scale of the project. “It does feel quite expensive, but in comparison with a big production that would involve a large dance company or a major installation it’s probably not that expensive.”

The other concern is that form takes precedence over content. For Decorne, “there’s a risk that people are seizing the opportunity of using new technology but they’re not looking at the content. If you’re not looking at the content it’s never good enough”.

“I’m bored of talking about VR now,” says Coffey. “Theatre needs to get over the novelty and start making some decent work.” With several VR documentary films in the pipeline, it seems that – for theatre – the virtual world is quickly becoming a reality.

CTRL is on at RADA Studios, London, July 12-16 and July 18-23. In the Eyes of the Animal is on at Cardiff’s Bute Park from July 15 to August 4

loading...
^