Equity secures wages for amateurs used by RSC for future Dream tour

placeholder-2-60
by -

The Royal Shakespeare Company has agreed to pay amateur performers appearing as part of its 2016 tour of A Midsummer Night’s Dream, following negotiations with Equity.

As part of his first full programme as artistic director of the company, Gregory Doran announced earlier this month that the show would feature local amateur performers to play the Mechanicals.

He said that the touring production, called Dream 16, would involve six different Mechanicals in each of the 12 regions of the UK that the show would visit.

The RSC was initially planning not to pay the non-professional actors. However, the union expressed concerns about the plan and the company has now agreed to provide the national minimum wage to the amateur performers.

Amateurs will receive payment for all rehearsals and performances that involve the professional RSC cast. Additional rehearsals conducted independently from the professional cast will not form part of the agreement.

The show will be presented as a co-production with each of the amateur companies and partner venues that the RSC will work with to stage the tour.

Equity assistant general secretary Stephen Spence said that amateur actors could be considered workers when they are directed independently and cannot be easily substituted. He said that the union considered the Mechanicals, which include the role of Bottom, to be substantial parts, which are likely to fall under these rules.

He said: “The way that these amateurs will be used by the RSC means they will almost certainly create a worker issue. The Equity deal with the RSC resolves any ambiguity. The way that the RSC is proposing to use them is that they will be directed individually and will not be able to be substituted because Bottom and the other Mechanicals are parts with substantial lines.”

The RSC is also planning to use different sets of local schoolchildren across the 12 regions to make up Titania’s fairy train. Spence added that there were no negotiations for the children to be paid.

RSC producer Jeremy Adams said: “Our Dream 16 project has been formed in close negotiation with Equity. At their suggestion we are approaching this project as a co-production with each of our partner theatres and amateur companies.

“When the amateur performers are rehearsing and performing with the RSC we are planning to pay the national minimum hourly wage rate in line with the Equity guidelines on employing and working with supernumeries. We are still working on further details with Equity as to how the logistics of this exciting project will work.”

2 Comments

  1. Good to see the RSC depriving pro. actors of a job!Paid amateurs, a total of 72,that’s the way to extend the unemployed actors queue. Disgraceful Gregory Doran.

  2. In another reorpt we heard about how council officers are working hard to find millions of pounds in efficiencies to help Bristol to keep as many services as possible in the face of vicious Government cutsPresumably Mark is referring to the ‘Changing Bristol Portfolio’? Here’s the summary section of the reorpt he refers to: Changing Bristol Portfolio is the primary vehicle through which MTFP savings will be delivered, but also must deliver a future council that will be sustainable and can react more readily to future changes. A great deal of work has now been completed in all Directorates to define their futureorganisational blueprints (target operating models). The senior leadership team haveidentified a number of areas where a One Council approach will be essential, and as aresult have prioritised two cross council programmes. Overall, the change portfolio is progressing largely to plan, with key risks being activelymanaged. The pace of delivery has increased, but needs to accelerate further asprogrammes move into their delivery phases. The challenge of providing the necessary specialist and business resources to deliversuch wide scale change is a significant delivery risk. Changes to governance arrangements are being implemented to provide tighter control of a more integrated change portfolio, particularly to act as a design authority and to manage dependencies between programmes.Anyone got any idea what’s actually happening? If you’re a glutton for punishment, the rest of the reorpt is here: (Check the graphic Appendix 1 on page 13 if you really want a laugh)

Leave a reply