Ebooks

Safety system works

Published Tuesday 26 June 2007 at 13:05

Stagecoach is a large organisation but there are around 300,000 children in performing arts that do not attend one of their part-time schools. In fact, to compare a Stagecoach franchise with a performing arts school is wrong. They do fill a very important gap in the market but, like us, many dance schools operate six to seven days a week, offering classes in ballet, modern, tap, jazz, drama, singing, Greek, national etc. Most children that attend dancing schools go through the grades, progressing year on year.

While we are happy to agree that there is some difference between some LEAs, on the whole, if given the statutory 21 days required, most will grant a licence in that time. It is vary rare that a license is not granted IF all the required information is given in on time. Yes, there is a lot of paper work involved, and yes, it could be streamlined by not requesting the same information each time, within a short period, but in essence the system does work.

In our 50-year history we have supplied children to many production companies for various tours and/or pantomime, including Ballet Russe, English National, Kevin Wood, Paul Elliott and a great deal to QDOS. These companies, especially QDOS, all understand the importance of child welfare and are very informed as to the requirements needed to licence children. The majority of arts schools like us build relationships with production companies and child employment officers, and this is where the system works. We all talk.

I don’t know what bad experience Stagecoach and some others have had but in our - and many amateur organisations’ - experience we know and appreciate that the LEAs do have the child’s interest at heart. Whatever people want changed, a body will still need to know if a child has had too many days off school or if that child is fit to perform. We think it does need to stay with a body who do not have a vested interest in the production, as this could lead to a great many more problems. While the present system is not perfect and some changes do need to take place regarding streamlining, it does work, as long as sufficient time is given. Twenty one days is plenty when licensing for a stage production. Up and down the country right now, thousands of schools will be beginning to organise licensing for the panto season ahead.

In our experience, the LEA and child employment officers do visit venues. West Sussex and Surrey, who we primarily deal with, have made great jumps in licensing chaperones and children. Chaperones are the key to making a production safe and they have excellent back up from their issuing LEA, with proper training and visits. It should not be forgotten that, by leaving things in the hands of the LEAs, our children are much safer as they, as education officers, do wield power.

Who is going to monitor the production companies if they have license control? I know of a production, an amateur one, where the child employment officer with the LEA and in working partnership with the venue - took a show off as it was clearly breaking the law by exceeding dramatically the hours the children had been rehearsing and performing on one day. Who is going to be able to do this if the granting of a licence is taken away from those that do not have a vested interest?

I know that Surrey LEA (under Ian Hart) produces an excellent guidelines book to licensing, as do others. It clearly sets out the hours and rules regarding children. Licensing a child is not rocket science. It is time consuming and would be much easier if done online with a few changes but in essence it does work. Most importantly, it does protect the children. It should be remembered that most licences for children are granted by the education welfare department of an LEA.

This is our experience as a dancing school. This is also the experience of the many dancing schools like us and amateur groups that regularly provide children for production companies and/or produce local shows.

Many thanks

Jacob Woodd

Roshe School

Newchapel Road

Lingfield

Surrey

SEARCH THE STAGE

Also in Features [RSS]

Access all areas
Following on from the letter on disabled access last week ( Letters, page 8,…
Words for the workers
‘The most voracious and passionate readers of the Bard’s work [19th century]…
First class director
Your article on the career of Peter Wilson, (page 32, April 10), director of…
Black/Asian actors are invisible
I was motivated to write in response to the article ( page 2, April 24 ) in…
Musical mystery
I wonder if Russell Davies ( Letters, page 8, May 1 ) is confusing the late…
Sound advice
Anthony Field’s article ‘Speaking up for diction’ (April 3, pages 10,11)…
Good old days
What on earth is Patrick Newley talking about? (March 20, page 52). The whole…
Same old story
With regard to the article in last week’s Stage about the Friday night…
Lansbury memories
I always enjoy reading Patrick Newley’s articles in The Stage and am amazed…
Slow motion
I note that the Writers Guild’s AGM is coming up shortly on June 4 and I have…

Content is copyright © 2008 The Stage Newspaper Limited unless otherwise stated.

All RSS feeds are published for personal, non-commercial use. (What’s RSS?)